My Top 10 Twitter Sins

Posted by Nathan Pralle On January - 4 - 20109 COMMENTS

Evil Twitter

I am a patient man.   I have even been occasionally marketed as, “reasonable”, although reports vary in the accuracy of such a bold statement.    I do have limits, however, as folks close to me may suggest, and I’ve identified the Top 10 Twitter Sins that should you commit them you may find me a follower no longer.

It’s nothing personal, trust; it’s simply a matter of management — I can’t possibly follow you on Twitter if you make it hard or painful for me to do so.    So here I give you:

The Top Ten Twitter Sins:

(no particular order)

1.   Over-self-promotion – Unless you are a clearly-identified business, over-promotion of yourself on Twitter is like masturbating in public.   It makes everyone uncomfortable and you’re the only one who feels good about it.    A mention here or there or touting your new blog post once or twice is fine; more than that and you need Kleenex for the cleanup.

2. Retweeting Everything – The re-tweet (RT) functionality lends a sense of community and connectivity to Twitter by showing other people some of the cool stuff you find.    This works until a person decides that everything they read is worthy of everyone else reading, which it isn’t.   It never is.    I don’t care how awesome the people are that you follow, repeating everything they say to all your followers is extremely annoying and agitating.     If we thought they were just as awesome, we’d be following them ourselves.    Don’t force us to follow by proxy because we won’t.

3.  Retweeting Instead of Replying — Hey, I get it;  you not only want to make a cute quip back to someone, but you want everyone on your list to see how clever you are, too.   And that’s fine here or there.   Doing it every time as a matter of form falls under the same umbrella as Sin #2 — if we wanted to see your repartee, we’d be following both of you.   You’re not that funny.

4.  Confusing Twitter with IM — This is a case of the right tool for the right job.    Twitter is not Instant Messaging.    IM is not Twitter.   Using Twitter to hold endless conversations with another as if it were IM causes your followers to gouge their eyes out.    “But they can’t see it when I reply, ” you say, “remember Sin #3?”    True, dear Tweep, but if I’m following BOTH of you, I can see everything passing between.    The occasional comment and snarky reply is fine — in fact, sometimes it’s great — but watching a day-long jab-fest?  No thanks.

5.  Blabbering — You know the sort, right?   The Tweep that just yaks and yaks and yaks because they are bored or they think their followers actually care that they just took a triple-S and are now sucking on a doughnut.   The rule here is minimalism, that’s why it’s limited to 140 characters — if you don’t have something interesting to say, please don’t feel the need to fill in the silence with endless tweets about the mundane.

6.  Follow-Mongering — Hey, I like followers, who doesn’t, right?   But constantly harping on how many or how few you have, or how often they reply to you, retweet you, or DM you only makes you look like a self-centered jackass.   If you’re interesting or funny or useful, you’ll be followed, and if not — you won’t!   Simple formula.   Followers gained through coercion are not quality.

7.  Tweeting the Play-by-Play — I realize that VeryImpressiveSportsTeam vs. HugeRival is a hell of a game and you wish you had an entire living room full of similarly-interested peeps to slurp nachos and cheer at every point, but the rest of us really don’t give a crap.    Want to give an update on the score or a general, overall comment?  Fine.     Going to put some indignant crap about SomePlayer and how he just got totally screwed on that play by BlindRef on Twitter?   FOUL.

8.  Confusing your Audiences — Twitter is not Facebook, nor is it Tumblr, Digg,  LinkedIn, Slashdot, IM, your blog or any other site on the Internet.   The audience you generate through Twitter is unique because the service itself generates a different type of follower than your friends/buddies/contacts on other sites.    What goes as a good status update in one place may not be great in another, so feel out your audience and give them what they enjoy, not what you are too lazy to adjust.

9.  Spoilers — If you interactively reveal the winner to SomeRealityShow, OtherBigEvent that everyone and their dog is watching, or MajorBigMovie, I will personally come over and whack you on the forehead with a tack hammer.   Not all of us watch at the same time; be courteous of those who may have DVRed it because they had to play with their kid for an evening.

10.  No Context – Tweeting or Retweeting something without context leaves your readers in the dark and confused as they search to figure out what you are even talking about.   Don’t make your tweeps work to follow you, it should be a pleasure — always enhance and improve anything you are passing on to the masses.

En Conclusion:

There’s many, many things I enjoy about Twitter — the clever folks, the funny tweets, the pictures of some guy’s wife’s cans, the poignant tweets that make me stop and think and wish I said it.    And if you are one of the folks that regularly cranks out high quality stuff like the above (especially the boobie shots), I salute you and enjoy following you terribly much.

There is, however, no need for all that great quality to be lost in the flood of crap from all the other people who doink up the network.    And some of them come out with really, really great stuff, but it’s all encased in feces and I don’t have time to sort through it all.

Keep it simple, keep it worthy, keep it relevant, keep it interesting.   Short and sweet is the mantra of Twitter and by avoiding the sins above, we’re going to have a long, long twife together.

My Old-School Tweet

Posted by Nathan Pralle On June - 26 - 2009Comments Off

Today my Twitter On Paper arrived!   For those of you who don’t know about this project, a guy named Sam Potts in Brooklyn, NY, decided that he would allow people to request that he write down, on paper, any Tweet he had previously made and mail it to the requesting person, free of charge.   He has just finished the project, capped at 1,000 hand-written and mailed Tweets, and I am now possessing one of them because I requested one before he finished — this is so cool!

So, here’s the envelope as it arrived.    Note that Sam has some incredibly good handwriting:

TOP_Envelope

Opening the envelope, I find two sheets of paper, one with a greeting from Sam on it, the other with my Tweet-on-Paper:

TOP_Contents

The greeting sheet reads, “Thank you for participating in Twitter on Paper.   You’re always welcome to send something* back, if you like, no obligation!    Sam Potts, Somestreet, Brooklyn, NY 11215   *of equal or lesser value, of course!

I will definitely be sending something back to Sam, but I have to think of something really creative and good.   I want to thank him for trying something pretty novel and curious and footing the entire bill for it.

My Tweet-on-Paper:

TOP_TheTOP

It reads:   “Ok no kidding people — when you get your ToP, do not blog about it.   Do not spread the word in any way.  This thing is already out of hand.” and it is stamped, “Jun 8 2009“.

The rules of Twitter-on-Paper stated that requestors had to specify a tweet that Sam had made himself, because he is the only owner of his own Tweets and the only one that has the legal copyright to distribute them as he wishes.   I picked the above Tweet because it’s kinda ironic — he’s Tweeting about the very thing that I requested.    A local black hole ought to open up near here any moment…

I think I’ll go and find a suitable frame for this little piece of Internet culture — after all, who knows in 5 years where Twitter and so forth will be?

A huge thanks to Sam Potts and his curiously fun little project — I love my Twitter on Paper!

Tweory (Twitter Theory)

Posted by Nathan Pralle On March - 20 - 20096 COMMENTS
Twho.   Twho.

Twho. Twho.

I am really fazed and confused by the recent development on Twitter of everyone “auto-following” and sites that help you automatically gain OMG numbers of followers as long as you follow them all back.

Seriously, are you people BORED!?

I tweet, of course — you can click on the “T” icon on the upper right to see my stream and/or follow me if you like, but I try to hold that which I transmit to the masses to a dull roar, and if I can, keep it to something interesting. I’m not about to tell you every time I use a Kleenex because, frankly, you probably don’t givashit. And if you do, you’re creeping me out. Shoo.

I use TwitterFox for watching my own stream of followees, but I keep it trimmed down to a short, scrubby brush. If you follow me and I don’t follow you back, or only do so for a little while, it means you’re not interesting enough to bother with. Don’t take it personally, but I have enough updates to watch without hearing about how incredibly sore the third pimple on your left buttcheek is. It’s not that I don’t care — I just…don’t care.

Have you seen my Tweets?

Have you seen my Tweets?

The other part is this: I have a limited number of CPU cycles in my brain that can do something during the day, and most of those are already taken up by work, family, Facebook, personal projects, and daydreaming about a very frightened and bikinied Julia Stiles. Twitter has to slip itself in there somewhere, and if it’s inserting junk, that’s just going to gum up my gears. Not a pretty sight.

That being said, there’s a good deal of Tweeps that add and enhance my life. Here’s a brief list of those folks I follow who are truly amusing and/or informative. You might find them likewise, or they might strike you as a step above goring your own liver out with a swizzle stick. Different strokes.

  • McCainBlogette – Meghan McCain, someone I’ll go into more later, but a fun-sounding gal, despite the political affiliation
  • Slashdot – Keeps me from having to read the webpage just to find the few stories I care about
  • wootshirt – A shirt a day of some odd incarnation
  • thatgirlonline – Caitlin Hill, TheHill88 on YouTube, social youth media at its quirkiness
  • planetmoney – NPR’s Planet Money, covering everything financial in real-world terms
  • dooce – Mmm….psycho mommy. Heart!
  • blurb – Dooce’s husband, an enigma into himself
  • DMRegister – The Des Moines Register, Iowa news
  • MarsRovers and CassiniSaturn – Because who doesn’t want to know all the sordid details of space probes?
  • richardbranson – Mostly self-promoting, but hey…it’s some dude in a wild haircut who is richer than sin. That’s kinda neat.
  • BrentSpiner – All the famous characters revealed in the man himself
  • levarburton – Butterflies in the sky, they can tweet twice as high
  • ComputerGeeks – Great deals on tech stuff from ComputerGeeks (geeks.com)
  • wilw – Wil Wheaton’s random timelines of thinking
  • BreakingNewz – The AP’s twitter feed for new news stories
  • DellOutlet – Deals from Dell on whatever’s on sale that day
  • thewino – Kris is inspiring to everyone, except those too dumb to read their way through her awesome writings

There’s more, of course — I’m following 93 people as of this writing — so don’t feel bad if you got left out (feel free to leave a link to yours in the commentary). Or check out my Twitter page to see who I all follow.

So….do you tweet? If so, why? If not, why not? And who do you like the best to follow if you do?