<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controversies: God, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosyphia.com/controversies/controversies-god-part-ii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosyphia.com/controversies/controversies-god-part-ii</link>
	<description>My Keyboard, My Sword</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David V.</title>
		<link>http://www.philosyphia.com/controversies/controversies-god-part-ii/comment-page-1#comment-4053</link>
		<dc:creator>David V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 08:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosyphia.com/?p=928#comment-4053</guid>
		<description>Hey Nathan dropped by because of your facebook post about languages, if you don&#039;t mind I&#039;d like to comment on this one, I&#039;ll lead off with a quote from Francis Bacon:

&quot;A little philosophy leads to atheism, depth in philosophy leads to God.&quot; 

  It seems you have did what so many before you have done, Locke, Bacon, Voltaire, Paine, Franklin (although he abandoned this view later in life-see his autobiography) and others built on Descartes ultimately ending up at what has been dubbed the &quot;Philosophers&#039; god&quot;, 18th century Deism.  You may find this view of God helpful, but keep in mind your views on God are your own and only you can figure it out.  Here are some links, the wiki&#039;s are pretty good at capturing everything I&#039;ve got a few blogs that may interested you too. In general there are two forms of Deism: English and French. The French version was a bit more anti-religious and was primarily responsible for the &quot;blind watchmaker&quot; version of God that pervades the internet these days.  The English version of God was a bit more tolerant of other religions and varied more widely on God&#039;s intervention in the world.  Coming out of a Catholic background I ended up on the &quot;english&quot; side of the spectrum, we can talk more about this sometime if you wish:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_and_French_Deism_in_the_Eighteenth_Century
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism
http://www.religioustolerance.org/deism.htm
http://www.positivedeism.com/
http://www.sullivan-county.com/deism.htm 
http://www.amorian.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nathan dropped by because of your facebook post about languages, if you don&#8217;t mind I&#8217;d like to comment on this one, I&#8217;ll lead off with a quote from Francis Bacon:</p>
<p>&#8220;A little philosophy leads to atheism, depth in philosophy leads to God.&#8221; </p>
<p>  It seems you have did what so many before you have done, Locke, Bacon, Voltaire, Paine, Franklin (although he abandoned this view later in life-see his autobiography) and others built on Descartes ultimately ending up at what has been dubbed the &#8220;Philosophers&#8217; god&#8221;, 18th century Deism.  You may find this view of God helpful, but keep in mind your views on God are your own and only you can figure it out.  Here are some links, the wiki&#8217;s are pretty good at capturing everything I&#8217;ve got a few blogs that may interested you too. In general there are two forms of Deism: English and French. The French version was a bit more anti-religious and was primarily responsible for the &#8220;blind watchmaker&#8221; version of God that pervades the internet these days.  The English version of God was a bit more tolerant of other religions and varied more widely on God&#8217;s intervention in the world.  Coming out of a Catholic background I ended up on the &#8220;english&#8221; side of the spectrum, we can talk more about this sometime if you wish:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_and_French_Deism_in_the_Eighteenth_Century">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_and_French_Deism_in_the_Eighteenth_Century</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism</a><br />
<a href="http://www.religioustolerance.org/deism.htm">http://www.religioustolerance.org/deism.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.positivedeism.com/">http://www.positivedeism.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.sullivan-county.com/deism.htm">http://www.sullivan-county.com/deism.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amorian.org/">http://www.amorian.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicheplayer</title>
		<link>http://www.philosyphia.com/controversies/controversies-god-part-ii/comment-page-1#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>nicheplayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosyphia.com/?p=928#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>I just hope I&#039;m around when this mess gets figured out.   :twisted:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope I&#8217;m around when this mess gets figured out.   <img src='http://www.philosyphia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif' alt=':twisted:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

